top of page
Writer's pictureTanuj Suthar

Digital Era and Relationships



In the labyrinth of modern relationships, we stand at the intersection of the tangible world of face-to-face interactions and the intangible universe of online connections. The increase in online social relationships in our tech-infused era poses the question: do online relationships give us the same feelings associated with offline ones and do they give us the same benefits? The normative and structural constraints that govern offline interactions seem to morph in the context of online relationships, which poses the question of whether our interactions differ in this virtual landscape. 


Friendship has a multi-faceted nature encompassing closeness, acceptance, help, and safety (Thein et al., 2012). The richness of high-quality friendships, characterized by intimacy, prosocial behavior, and a buffer against conflicts and rivalry, becomes apparent (Berndt, T. J., 2002). But what about other factors impacted by friendship? Factors such as self-esteem have been found time and again to have a close relationship with positive friendships. This brings to the table questions about whether the dimensions of closeness, acceptance, and safety are as tangible in the digital realm as they are in face-to-face interactions. Can the screen foster the same intimacy or introduce a unique dynamic that eludes traditional measures? In this quest, the focal point becomes the intricate dance between friendship quality and the mode of the friendship. Can online connections wield the same transformative power as the bonds forged in physical proximity? 


For me, online and offline friendships each play distinctive roles in my life. Online friendships have allowed me to connect with people who share similar interests, forming bonds over discussions and shared experiences within digital spaces. The convenience of constant communication, despite physical distances, has been a source of comfort. However, the challenge lies in navigating the authenticity of online personas and resolving conflicts without the nuances of face-to-face interactions. On the other hand, offline friendships hold a special place as they involve immediate, tangible connections. Being able to share physical spaces, engage in activities, and witness non-verbal cues enhances the depth of these relationships. While offline friendships may face hurdles when friends move away, the trust established through direct observation often leads to swift conflict resolution.


Both types of friendships contribute uniquely to our social landscapes, offering a diverse range of experiences and connections that enrich my life in different ways. Whether it's the constant virtual companionship or the immediate presence of offline friends, each friendship brings its own set of advantages and challenges, contributing to the tapestry of personal connections.





References


Cheng, C., Lau, Y. K., & Chan, L. K. (2006). Prevalence of social and leisure activities and their potential health implications among Hong Kong Chinese: a population-based survey. Health Education Research, 21(5), 664-674.


Chan, D. K., & Hui, E. K. (2004). Preliminary validation of the Chinese version of the Physical Activity Rating Scale (PARS) in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 12(2), 201-212.


Thein, N. Y., & Lee, K. (2012). Attachment security in infants of Asian immigrant mothers in the United States: An exploratory study. Early Child Development and Care, 182(3-4), 525-540.


Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 7-10.


Franco, N., & Levitt, M. J. (1998). The influence of friendship quality, loneliness, and social contact frequency on adolescents' depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Journal of Adolescence, 21(6), 621-640.


0 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page